But before the industry embarks on a journey to find new financing options, it needs to embrace to two important factors - Compliance and Transparency - in the way it operates. Both being critical issues and absence of which has led to the Banks moving out of diamond industry financing or restricting their exposure to the industry.
So are we ready for change? Are we ready to give up age-old ways of business and bring in Corporatisation and Professionalism in the sector? The industry has no other way but to embrace acute transparency and corporate governance in order to restore the bank’s faith in the industry.
As the international financing to the industry has reduced, the major part of the funds for the industry comes from Indian banks. However, they have tightened lending norms and made funding difficult.
However, major onus of getting the funds still lies with the industry as it is up to them as how they restore lost faith and reinstate the credibility of the industry as a whole. Also, the industry needs to be forthcoming in regards to taking action against miscreants especially ‘willful defaulters’. In this, the GJEPC, BDB and MDMA can play a larger role. The GJEPC has already mooted ‘MyKYC’ which is an online networking platform for the diamond industry to improve transparency in transactions.
Apart from this, the banks need to have tailormade financing solutions especially designed forthe diamond industry.
This and many more issues related to diamond financing were discussed at a length during a special finance seminar - Diamond Financing Seminar: New Realities, New Opportunities - jointly organised by India’s Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), the Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB) and the World Federation of Diamond Bourses (WFDB), held as a special segment of the Presidents Meeting of the WFDB, in Mumbai.
Diamond Financing
Diamonds being high value products depend
on financing, especially for the midstream (i.e.
polishing) as rough diamonds are sold in cash
while customer demand long (3-4 month) credit
terms. Indian banks have supported the industry
as it has grown to be a world leader in the midstream
segment. However, banks have restrained
themselves from lending to the gem and jewellery
sector at a time when margins have reduced and
prices have become more volatile. Internationally,
few large banks are withdrawing from the industry
while some others are withdrawing credit lines due
to reasons unrelated to the diamond business or
compliance or Basel II restrictions.
Inaugural Session
The dignitaries for the inaugural sessions of
the third such financing seminar conducted by
the GJEPC included Sudhir Mungantiwar (Hon.
Finance Minister, Maharashtra State), Manoj
Dwivedi (Jt. Secretary, Union Ministry of Commerce,
Government of India), Praveenshankar Pandya
(Chairman, GJEPC), Russell Mehta (Vice Chairman,
GJEPC), P. S. Jaykumar (MD & CEO, Bank of Baroda),
Karnam Sekar (Dy. MD & Chief Credit Officer, State
Bank of India), Ernest Blom (WFDB President),
Anoop Mehta (Chairperson, Bharat Diamond
Bourse), Biju Patnaik (EVP, IndusInd Bank) and
Ajesh Mehta Convener, Banking, Insurance,
Addressing the inaugural session,
Praveenshankar Pandya, Chairman, GJEPC, said,
“The Indian diamond sector cuts and polishes a
billion pieces and gets USD 6 bn from India and
around USD 5.5 bn from international banking
channels. The support of the banking & finance
sector will be crucial for the future growth of the
gem and jewellery sector.”
Pandya added, “To make the sector further organised, and to enable banks to get concrete information to do the right due diligence while sanctioning credits, GJEPC has intensified measures for corporatization of MSME units in diamond cutting and polishing. Bankers have a great opportunity to provide financing for the MSME sector, which constitutes one third of the total business thereby bringing them to the mainstream. One of the important steps taken by the GJEPC to further improve transparency in transactions in the sector is starting a KYC online networking platform for the diamond industry. The project helps its members and global participants to maintain their Know Your Customer information on a centralized web-based platform and share it with other members online through important gem & jewellery associations of the world. GJEPC seeks the Government support to move towards a European Union turnover tax type model for the trade. We also seek the formation of a Banking Committee that meets regularly, engages the trade and gives direction to the gems and jewellery sector.” Taxation Sub-Committee (BITC-GJEPC).
Presentations/Panel Discussions
The seminar featured a presentation from former
Diamond Trading Company (DTC) CEO Varda Shine,
who spoke about variety of future options including receivables securitisation, inventory securitisation,
purchase credit, an increase in equity, peer-to-peer
financing and fin-tech options like crowd funding.
This was followed by presentations by Walter Gontarek of Channel Capital Advisors on institutional investors, Paul Boots of Osprey Advisors on internet-enabled peer-to-peer and crowd funding. ABN Amro’s Head of Diamond & Jewellery Clients, Erik Jens, spoke about the nature of the financing challenges facing the diamond trade while George Abhraham from Emirates NBD explained about diamond financing scenario in the Middle East.
Anjan Ghosh of the Indian Credit Rating Agency (ICRA) talked about how the diamond industry was also viewed as a no-growth sector while IndusInd Bank Executive Vice President Biju Patnaik, pointed out that leaving secured creditors as the last to receive settlement while trade players with equity involved were bailed out first in the event of a bankruptcy did not induce confidence.
Besides, a panel discussion was conducted by Latha Venkatesh, Executive Editor CNBC-TV 18, which followed, with the participation of Pandya,Jaykumar, Karnam Sekar, who were joined by Biju Patnaik, EVP IndusInd Bank and Russell Mehta, Vice Chairman GJEPC, to discuss the various issues in an open and frank manner. There was a consensus amongst the panelists that there was a need for banks to do their due diligence carefully, understand the eco-system of the diamond industry and that the diamond trade should come forward to provide information inputs both, about the industry and the players within it.
The international session at the Diamond Financing Summit covered the changes affecting the financing available to the industry and alternates to bank financing, which can become potential means for new types of financing.
Let us know more about the Crowd Funding and Peer-to-peer Lending
Crowd Funding
‘Crowd Funding’ generally refers to a method of
funding a project or venture through small amounts
of money raised from a large number of people,
typically through a portal acting as an intermediary.
There are numerous forms of crowd funding: some
are charitable donations that provide intangible
benefits but no financial returns; others, such as
equity crowd funding would fall within the domain
of financial markets.
Peer-to-Peer or P2P Lending
P2P lending has lately gained momentum in India. During the seminar, how P2P can work for diamond industry was discussed at length. According to data released by P2PFA, the cumulative lending through P2P platforms globally, at the end of Q4 of 2015, has reached 4.4 billion GBP1. Lending through P2P has grown dramatically from 2.2 million GBP in 2012 to 4.4 billion GBP in 2015. Let us first find out what is P2P lending.
According to a Consultation Paper on Peer-To- Peer (P2P) Lending by Reserve Bank of India (RBI),P2P lending is a form of crowd-funding used to raise loans which are paid back with interest. It can be defined as the use of an online platform that matches lenders with borrowers in order to provide unsecured loans. The borrower can either be an individual or a legal person requiring a loan. The interest rate may be set by the platform or by mutual agreement between the borrower and the lender. Fees are paid to the platform by both the lender as well as the borrower.
The borrowers pay an origination fee (either a flat rate fee or as a percentage of the loan amount raised) according to their risk category. The lenders, depending on the terms of the platform, have to pay an administration fee and an additional fee if they choose to use any additional service (e.g. legal advice etc.), which the platform may provide. The platform provides the service of collecting loan repayments and doing preliminary assessment on the borrower’s creditworthiness. The fees go towards the cost of these services as well as the general business costs. The platforms do the credit scoring and make a profit from arrangement fees and not from the spread between lending and deposit rates as is the case with normal financial intermediation.
While crowd funding - equity, debt based and fund based- would fall under the purview of capital markets regulator (SEBI), P2P lending would fall within the domain of the Bank.
There is no credible data available regarding total lending through P2P platforms in India. However, the number of such Companies has been increasing significantly. According to newspaper reports, close to 20 new online P2P lending companies have been launched in the last one year. Presently, there are around 30 start-up P2P lending companies in India.
In India, the P2P lending is currently unregulated. However, the RBI is expected to come out with final guidelines on P2P lending soon.
Follow DiamondWorld on Instagram: @diamondworldnet
Follow DiamondWorld on Twitter: @diamondworldnet
Follow DiamondWorld on Facebook: @diamondworldnet